This morning my voice is hoarse.I am guilty of yelling at the tv.
Last night, I managed to sit through an entire 45 minute speech, for history sake. Yes, I am a history buff. Yes, I greatly appreciate the historical event of last night. Yes, I was even excited to listen to our first Black Presidential Nominee speak on the anniversary of the "I had Dream" speech.
What a contrast to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr's speech.
Not once did Barack Obama refer to the Constitution, which as President of the United States all his rights and powers are defined. Dr. King referred to the Constitution as 'magnificent' and 'sacred'.
Barack Obama speaks of a government that will "help families pay for college" and help those "find a job that pays the mortgage", instead of find a home within their salary and sacrifice and save, just as his Grandma did. Dr. King spoke of the "riches of freedom and the security of justice" and he refused to believe that "there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation".
Dr. King wanted the opportunity for his people to live the American dream. Barack Obama wants the government to do "that which we cannot do for ourselves".
I am shocked I did not see this direct quote in Obama's speech "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs." Barack Obama see's himself as the great unifier, or I would argue, the great equalizer. Only one infamous philosopher could see this great Change coming when he said, "Democracy is the road to socialism." Thank you Karl Marx. I am afraid we are on that road with Obama in the driver's seat.
And on a completely different note....
Sarah WHO!?!?!? Sarah Palin, 2 year Governor of Alaska. Pro's: Ethically strong, Executive experience, Fiscally conservative, personally Pro-Life (didn't opt for a physician approved medically needed abortion), Gun Owner, strong family values, etc. Con's: Foreign Relations experience, No-National/World exposure experience, no-Washington experience. So in other words, EXPERIENCE! It will be very interesting to see how the mother of 5 adapts to the really public life. Will she get rid of the 90's claw that holds up her thick hair into a french twist? (Of course I'm commenting on appearance, at this point that's all the information I have!)
Are you as baffled as I am?
11 comments:
I must say again and again...DITTO! Obama is more about being friends with Oprah than actually making our country better. For example, so he had a ton of celebrities at the convention supporting him. But when it comes down to it...celebrities make up about 2% of the population, so maybe he should care a little bit more about Joe Smith who lives in Gary, Indiana and not Beyonce and Jay-Z. I am off my soapbox now. Oh wait, and the whole VP thing just throws me off. I am not sure what to think.
Wow. Thanks for the political update. I don't keep on it so I will just talk to you and see whats going on.
Yes, history is definitely in the making. As for the quote you referenced "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.", that sounds quite similar to this "The law of consecration requires dedicating all of one's time, talents, and possessions to the Church and its purposes (D&C 82:19; 64:34; 88:67-68; 98:12-14). John A. Widtsoe, an apostle, noted that its operation was quite simple. Those who joined such an order were to place all their possessions in a common treasury—the rich their wealth, the poor their pittance. Then each member was to receive a sufficient portion—called an "inheritance"—from the common treasury to enable that person to continue in trade, business, or profession as desired. The farmer would receive land and implements; the tradesman, tools and materials; the merchant, necessary capital; the professional person, instruments, books, and the like. Members working for others would receive proportionate interests in the enterprises they served. No one would be without property. All would have an inheritance (Widtsoe, pp. 302-303)."http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/basic/doctrines/consecration/law_eom.htm. Food for thought...
P.S. Sarah Palin is HOT!
Do you think she's related to Michael Palin? He's funny!
I completely agree Eric! Let's have a trial run in the Bushman family, see how it works out.
I was shocked. I was still holding out for Romney. From what little I know of her so far (listening to the radio yesterday) I am beginning to like her. She has me intrigued in the election again at least.
And way to go... listening to that speech. Obama and his socialist ideas make me angry so i can't even listen to him. I don't see why everyone likes him.
A-stinking-Men! haha. you are so funny!
Great post Sarah! In reference to the comment above on the law of consecration...yes this is our belief and when the Lord himself or his prophet gives us the opportunity to live this law it will be a blessing and joy to all! But.......I have no interest in Obama, Hillary Clinton or any Government leader Republican or Democrat directing such a program. It has been tried and we call it socialism which in turn becomes communism. Not interested.
Obama freaks me out!! There is just something hiding in his countenance that is just not right!! I fear for all of us if he wins!! I can't express how happy however that McCain chose this lady!! I got goosebumps when she spoke for the first time. I think she will do a Fabulous job!! I feel bad that she has been so much CRAP said about her the last few days but thats how it goes when you are in the public eye and on one know anythign about you.
I think by choosing her McCain has an even better chance to win!! Very interesting this election year!!
I don't know anything about politics, but I like her! I like her clip too ;)
Post a Comment